Влияние туризма на экономику и социально-культурную сферу

    Дисциплина: Разное
    Тип работы: Курсовая
    Тема: Влияние туризма на экономику и социально-культурную сферу

    1. Introduction.
    Tourism is the world’s largest and fastest growing industry. In recent years there have been increases in international tourism for the purpose of experiencing another culture.
    There is a wide-spread opinion that the economic impact of tourism is always positive while the social and environmental impact is always negative. Indeed, increasing incomes to
    regions due to tourists are easy to see as well as numerous host-tourist conflicts and destruction of the environment and local cultures. However, tourism can have both positive and
    negative outcomes for residents in communities when sharing and preserving their culture and nature could be seen as conflicting goals. (Besculides, Lee, McCormick, 2002:303) In this
    paper I will consider impacts of tourism with reference to the Lofoten Islands. This is a popular tourist destination in Northern Norway. The area is unique because of its nature and
    variety of sea activities, e.g. fishing, boat trips, sailing etc. It is also known in Norway as a traditional fishing community, where the fishing industry dominates the economy and
    the social life of the local people. Today those resources which used to be source of living for the local community have become very attractive for tourists. It is a challenge to get
    most profits of the situation and avoid possible conflicts.
    2. Economic impacts of tourism
    According to recent statistics, tourism provides 10 percent of the world’s income and employs almost one tenth of the world’s workforce (www.investigate.html). By the year 2010
    these numbers will double. All considered, tourism’s actual and potential economic impact is astounding. Many people emphasise positive aspects of tourism as a source of foreign
    exchange, a way to balance foreign trade, an “industry without chimney” – in short, manna from heaven.(L.van den Berghe, source unknown) But there are also negative sides of tourism’s
    economic boom for local communities:
    Economic impacts to the local community depend on how much of the incomes generated by tourists go to the host communities. In most all-inclusive package tours more than 80
    percent of travellers’ fees go to the airlines, hotels and other international companies, not to local businessmen and workers (www.ecotourism.org).
    Large hotel chain restaurants often import food to satisfy foreign visitors and rarely employ local staff for senior management positions, preventing local farmers and workers
    from reaping the benefit of their presence.
    Resorts and hotels often over-consume natural resources like water and power, forcing utility prices up and causing blackouts and water shortages for locals.
    Many tourists never leave the hotel grounds or cruise ship, reducing the possibility of tourist income for local businesses. “Rug sack tourists” have little effect on host
    communities as they consume very little during the trip.
    Faced with limited economic prospects, locals lose the incentive to preserve and conserve their natural and cultural resources.
    Sometimes the costs connected with tourism overcome the incomes that tourists generate. For example, in all-inclusive packages, as I have said, most of the expenditures go to
    the airlines, hotel chains and touroperators, while the local communities have to work with pollution and destruction in their region caused by tourists.
    As a result, it costs a lot for the local communities to preserve the nature and the cultural monuments in the region while a good deal of incomes flow out of the
    host-region.
    With reference to the Lofoten Islands the question is how the fishing society can get the most of the tourism industry, and whether the local people can get positive economic
    effects out of the developing tourism in their region.
    Here is a figure showing relationship between tourism and local community based on economic impacts.
    How much income does tourism give to the
    local community?
    How much resource does tourism use in the area?
    A lot of
    Little
    A lot of
    Acceptable tourism
    Undesirable tourism
    Little
    Desirable tourism
    “Invisible” tourism
    Fig.1 “ A general model of the local communities’ opinion about tourism” Ronningen 1996
    Kilde: Kulturturisme. Lofoten som reiselivsattraksjon.
    Hovedfag.PDF, www.nhh.no/geo/prosjekt/kbl/r200rapport.pdf
    The figure shows 4 types of economic impacts of tourism, based on the coming incomes and the use of resources. No community would want tourism that uses a lot of resources in
    the area but leaves little money to the local population. Such tourism can be called undesirable. Communities can put up with tourism that gives tem a lot of incomes but also uses a
    lot of resources. It is the so-called acceptable tourism. In case when the use of resources is little and the incomes to the region are also little, the effect of tourism is almost
    not seen. This is the so-called “invisible” tourism. So the economic impact will be considered as positive even if the resources are used to great extent, in case if tourism gives
    large incomes to the local people as a result. Hovland (source unknown) divided economic impacts of tourism into direct and indirect. Direct effects are most visible and easy to
    measure. These are contacts between a visitor and local actors, such as the tourist industry, other industries, municipality and other local actors. Indirect effects of tourism appear
    when local businesses, population, municipalities and other actors are influenced by tourism through other actors. I shall now discuss these relations between tourism and fishery
    industry on the Lofoten Islands. As I have emphasised Lofoten is an international destination with coast life culture as a primary tourism resource. From1960 there have been problems
    in fishing industry and the number of employees has decreased. So increasing development of tourism compensates decreasing development of fishery industry. If we take direct impacts
    of tourism, they are following here: people have a possibility to get jobs in tourism industry and tourists spend lots of money in local-owned restaurants, hotels, museums. Tourism
    industry uses some resources that are not used by fishermen today. Old fishing houses-rorbuer
    - may have disappeared from the local landscapes if they were not used today as hotels. Here are some numbers to show the development of tourism in the region. In 1964 there were
    just 200 beds in local hotels and guesthouses and 150 beds in rorbuer in the whole Lofoten. In 1997 there were about 1360 beds just in Vagan district. The total amount of overnight
    stays in Lofoten has increased from 25000 in 1965 to 230000 in 1997. (Puijk 1996, SSB 1997) As we can see there is a flow of incomes to the region and this is a direct economic impact
    of tourism.
    Still there are negative economic impacts of tourism as well caused by common resources for tourism and fishery industries on the Lofoten islands. That’s why in spite of
    co-existing side by side these two industries compete ...

    Забрать файл

    Похожие материалы:


ПИШЕМ УНИКАЛЬНЫЕ РАБОТЫ
Заказывайте напрямую у исполнителя!


© 2006-2016 Все права защищены